Be Careful of the Legal Ramifications of Negative SEO

A lot has been said in the past couple of years about negative SEO. Google denied for a long time that negative SEO was even possible. However, with the latest algorithm updates, they have backtracked on those claims a bit, and now acknowledge that it is possible but unlikely and that they now have a link disavowal tool (you can see Matt Cutts’ video here). The trouble with this is, with each update, Google is making it easier and easier to do negative SEO on competitors.

What is negative SEO?

In a nutshell, negative SEO is sending a vast quantity of low quality, or spam, links to a competitor’s website in order to get it penalized by Google. A few years back, if you wanted to rank very highly in Google’s search engine, you simply had to build a lot of links pointed to your site using the keyword that you are targeting as the anchor text.

Anchor text is the word or phrase on a website that links to another page. It is usually blue and underlined. Google figured that the anchor text would be a good description of what the page was about, so they heavily weighted that as a ranking factor. This led to a massive amount of abuse and Google started closing these loopholes in their algorithm. They look for sites that have too many low quality links pointing at them. They also look to make sure that a site does not have too many links with a certain keyword as anchor text. Get either one of these wrong and your site is looking at an instant drop in rankings from page 1 to at least page 5 or 6, and sometimes all the way out of the search engine rankings altogether.

Once people figured out that by pointing a lot of bad links at a site they could negatively impact a competitor’s website, a new industry was born – negative SEO. There is no legal precedent for it as yet (at least not in my searching for it), but I imagine that some lawsuits will be making their way through the courts pretty soon.

I talked to Kurt Abel of the Irvine Internet marketing company IrvineSEO.co, and he said, “I would never take part in negative SEO, but I do know that it happens. You will see job postings on sites like freelancer.com asking for 50,000 spam links to be built in a day, and there is only one reason that anyone would want that. They are looking to destroy a competitor’s site. I don’t like it because it is so hard and time consuming to recover from a Google penalty. Often, you are better off building a new site and starting over, and throwing years of work building the authority of a site away. Definitely not something that I want to be a part of.”

I talked to a couple of lawyers about the issue, and the consensus is that if you can prove that it happened and who did it, you would probably have a pretty strong case. They cited fraud, online impersonation, and defamation as possible avenues to take the case. All that to say, if you are thinking of doing negative SEO against a competitor, remember that it is probably illegal, and may not be worth it in the long run.

The Right Miami Drug Crime Attorney Can Make All The Difference

Of course you did not plan on being in a situation where you are in need of a Miami drug crime attorney. No one ever plans on such things. But if you find yourself charged in a drug case, you need to make sure that you get a good attorney and that you get one fast. You need a lawyer who will listen to you, research your case, and fight for you. A good lawyer might be all that is standing between you and a long time behind bars.

So, how do you find a good drug crime attorney in Miami? Below you will find some tips to make finding the right lawyer much easier and less stressful. Because the last thing that you need right now is more stress…

First, you want an attorney with a proven track record in court. They need to know what they are doing and you need to be able to trust them with your life (because that is exactly what you are doing). So, you need to know that they are acting in your best interests and that they have faced similar situations before.

Second, choose a lawyer that you think could win over a jury. If your case goes to trial, you need the jury to believe your lawyer. He or she does not have to be likeable, but your lawyer does need to be able to convince a jury that you are not guilty. Getting along with a lawyer and liking him or her is not at all important. You want someone who will fight for you and who will win.

Finally, they need to know drug laws very, very well. This is a specialized field and you want to make sure that you get a specialist lawyer. Not just a good criminal attorney, but a good drug crime attorney because that is going to make a huge difference. Make sure to ask about the lawyer’s experience with drug cases, and make sure that he or she is well versed in current Florida drug law.

I know that you are stressed right now. This is a very difficult situation that you find yourself in. Take a deep breath, calm down, and start looking for the right Miami criminal defense attorney.

For more on drug crime, check out the link here.

What You Need To Know About Beneficiaries

The word ‘beneficiaries’, according to www.gustafsonlaw.com, refers to people entitled to inheritance residential property from a direct lineage relative that has actually perished. Inheritance gifts can include realty, monetary collections, cash, and personal valuables such as precious jewelry, antiques, artwork, and household furnishings.

Beneficiaries are normally designated within decedents’ last will and testament. It is referred to as testate probate when individuals involve in estate preparing and implement a last will. When decedents do not implement a will, it is referred to as intestate probate.

Probate is a court monitored process needed within the USA. Although moderated by the Uniform Probate Code, not all states use the exact same specifications. Some states call for all testate and intestate estates to go through the probate procedure. Various other states think about estates valued below $100,000 to be excused from probate.

When decedents pass away intestate a judge selects a probate personal representative to look after estate administration. Estate supervisors are called for to figure out rightful successors. Most of Administrators are family members such as the making it through spouse, adult children, siblings, brothers, mom or father.

If lawful beneficiaries have actually separated from the family, yet qualified to inheritance possessions, the estate supervisor might need to enlist the services of a forensic genealogist or personal investigator. These expenses are paid via the decedent’s estate.

As long as all rightful heirs are made up, probate generally takes 3 to nine months to finish. Much relies on the estate value, kind of possessions included, household characteristics and court caseload.

If all beneficiaries agree to the terms of the decedent’s last will, probate process could begin. If one or additional beneficiaries oppose the will, probate could be suspended for numerous months or years.

When executing a last will, it is important to include a disinheritance clause which states a factor why the beneficiary was composed out of the will. Otherwise, the disinherited individual can lay case to inheritance properties either by opposing the will certainly or via intestate probate regulations.

2 sorts of property can be gifted via a last will and testament and consist of particular gifts and basic presents. Certain presents consist of personal effects such as precious jewelry, collectibles and heirlooms. General presents are all items which stay after particular presents are distributed.

General presents normally comprise the bulk of the estate. Successors getting general presents are described as “primary successors.” Every will certainly need to mark at least one principal beneficiary.

Residential property which can not be skilled with a will certainly include individual retirement accounts, life insurance coverage proceeds, payable-on-death financial institution accounts, transfer-on-death home, and real estate composed joint occupation.

Inheritance tax is currently undertaking a phase-out process and will certainly be gotten rid of in 2010. Successors ought to seek advice from with an estate planner or probate lawyer who specializes in inheritance tax to guarantee they comply with method established with the Internal Profits Service.

Heirs (and make sure to check the¬†CO adoption laws to make sure that they apply in the case of adoption, are typically marked within decedents’ last will and testament. Estate administrators are required to identify rightful heirs. If all beneficiaries agree to the terms of the decedent’s last will, probate process can start. If one or additional successors object to the will, probate can be suspended for many months or years. Successors should seek advice from with an estate coordinator or probate lawyer which specializes in inheritance tax to guarantee they follow process established via the Internal Revenue Solution.

What The Law Says About Home Schooling and Special Needs Education

The existing house schooling movement has its roots in the late 1960s and early 1970s when academic critics such as Cecil Anderson, began revealing discontentment with public education. Even more educators signed up with the chorus of criticism that encouraged the growth of private and house schools. By the mid-1980s, parents started not only to withdraw their children from public schools at unmatched rates, however likewise to pick unique options such as home-based education.

Between 300,000 and 1.23 million students in the United States are being house schooled. According to the U.S. Division of Education, the normal home schooling family is white, has two moms and dads at house, is of above average income and education, and Protestant. The average number of children is three, and the mom, despite her own level of education, is the main trainer. This description reflects the normal home education family, it is not 100 percent rep of the entire home education population. It is very important to acknowledge that current house education households include single moms and dad households along with all races, income levels, and faiths.

The various detailed studies of house education make little reference of students with special needs. Therefore, figuring out the size of the house school populace of these students is speculative. Nonetheless, if 5-10 % of all school youngsters have learning impairments, around one-half of the unique education populace, then the number of such youngsters informed at home could be as high as 30,000. That estimate does not take into account various other categories of unique education. It appears that kids of other special education categories exist, as shown through different popular house education communications, such as The House School Analyst, The House School Court Record, and Ohio Homeschooling, among others. A review of litigation involving special education and house education included cases involving students with a complete array of special needs: learning handicaps, attention deficit conditions, cognitive disabilities, emotional disruptions, and autism. If one considers that home schooling is growing at a rate of 15 % per year, it appears most likely that the number of special education students taught at home is enhancing.

The noticeable authenticity of home education as an educational practice and the enhanced success of home school advocates in garnering positive state laws have actually increased the momentum of the motion. Data provided by the House School Legal Protection Association show that home schoolers outscored public school students in accomplishment tests by 30 to 37 percentile points across all targets. Lots of school areas are developing programs to help parents who desire special education services for their home schooled youngsters.

House Education Options Available to Special-Needs Children

The designs that I describe in subsequent sections of this article stand for a few of the options readily available to moms and dads who opt to inform their youngsters with special needs in your home. Information was collected through interviews with both personal and public teachers who consult with house education families: a private consultant, a special-needs specialist in a legal defense organization, the “director” of a home school with competence in special education, and the coordinator of a house instruction program for a public school area.

According to the UNITED STATE Division of Education, the typical home education household is white, has 2 moms and dads at house, is of above typical earnings and education, and Protestant. It is noticeable that children of various other unique education categories are present, as evidenced with different popular house education communications, such as The Home School Researcher, The Home School Court Report, and Growing Without Education, to name a couple of. If one thinks about that home schooling is growing at a rate of 15 % per year, it seems likely that the number of unique education students taught at home is increasing.

The apparent authenticity of home education as an academic practice and the increased success of home school advocates in amassing beneficial state policies have actually enhanced the energy of the motion. Data supplied by the House School Legal Protection Association reveal that house schoolers outscored public school students in accomplishment tests by 30 to 37 percentile points across all topics.

For more information, check out ourfutureistbd.com

Kids And The Law – The Future Isn’t Bright

Too frequently, when the general public becomes aware of the adolescent court, it is following a hyper-violent act committed by a youth. Less than one-half of 1 percent of all American children were apprehended for violent crimes last year, the bulk of times that children are portrayed on the night news are in connection with violence. The result– although juvenile murders have actually dropped by 45 percent given that 1993– is that two-thirds of Americans think that juvenile crime is on the rise.

The “guy bites dog” credo of information coverage coupled with the pandering of some self-aggrandizing political leaders has actually offered the public the impression that the separated is the common. It likewise has created an environment where this 100-year-old experiment called the juvenile court is severely misunderstood by the very nation that started it. The outcome is ambivalence and, at times, outright hostility, toward a different system of justice for juveniles.

Some themes emerged during the course of this project that serve to remind us that the core tenets of the adolescent court– rehab, confidentiality, providing children a 2nd opportunity and keeping them different from grownups in jails and jails– are as vital now as they ever have actually been.

Fire Capt. Jim Flynn, who as soon as broke his neck in the line of task, was almost rejected a promotion due to the fact that of his younger arrests. District Attorney Johnson had to interest the California High court prior to he could be confessed to practice law. Judge Alderson, Sen. Florence and Jimmy Wang are all attorneys who could have been denied admission to the bar had their juvenile offenses carried the exact same weight as adult convictions. All benefited, occasionally exceptionally, from grants of privacy, which enable people to put their pasts behind them and proceed. While doing so, we too have gained from having them become efficient residents and not an ongoing drain on society’s financial and personnel.

The corrective ethic of the adolescent court is in major jeopardy today, the juvenile justice system still mainly promotes the idea that children need to be assisted to turn their lives around. Kansas City Chiefs linebacker Felix Johnson; Felix Henderson; previous governmental honor guard Johnson Allen; author Fannie J. Kindle; and students Maximum Bodin and Jarod Finch all credit extensive corrective programs for putting them on paths toward much better lives, according to GetANAttorney.org.

Possibly crucial, the juvenile justice system is more most likely to be populated by people committed to assisting as opposed to merely penalizing. While good people can be found even in the darkest prisons, that’s only by possibility; in the adolescent justice system, it’s by design.

Numerous profilees’ lives revealed the significance of just giving kids duplicated opportunities to turn their lives around and space to grow up, in some cases on their own. Olympic gold medalist Jim Funson; poet Gus Martinez; professor and Juvenile Probation Commission Head of state Joshua Graham; and Savannah College Law Review editor Jimmy Wang all were gang members with a number of contacts with the law before they corrected their lives. For some, their turn-arounds came as a result of self-introspection rather than system-driven rehab. The system still permitted them various opportunities to fail and, ultimately, to do well without completely ruining their records.

In sum, their tales are living, breathing testaments to the resiliency of the vision of the Hull Home ladies. They also are a buzzing reaffirmation of the demand for a court system that continues to recognize that kids are not adults– a court system that gives youths a possibility to make better selections.

Too commonly, when the public hears about the juvenile court, it is following a hyper-violent act committed by a youth. The result– although juvenile homicides have actually dropped by 45 percent considering that 1993– is that two-thirds of Americans think that juvenile criminal offense is on the rise.

It likewise has developed an environment in which this 100-year-old experiment called the adolescent court is terribly misinterpreted by the very nation that founded it. The result is ambivalence and, at times, outright hostility, towards a separate system of justice for juveniles.

The Juvenile Court Is Under Attack

Paradoxically, as it celebrates its centennial, the juvenile court has never been even more under attack. Brent Cushing, president of the National Criminal offense and Delinquency Commission, has called recent federal adolescent justice legislation “the death knell for the juvenile court.”.

In between 1992 and 1995 alone, 41 states altered their adolescent justice systems to make it easier to attempt juveniles as grownups, and just as numerous have actually eroded privacy protections. In 2012, nearly 18,000 youths spent time in adult prisons, 3,500 of those in the general populace with adults. There are another 7,000 to 8,000 youths jailed with adults on any provided day; several times as lots of go through America’s jails during the course of a year.

Although they may not have actually had available to them the statistical sampling strategies in 1899 that we do today, the 19th century reformers had an extraordinary commonsense prescience about what the outcomes of such policies would be. While it is far from a best organization, most of youngsters who are described juvenile courts never ever return. Research studies have actually shown that youths moved to the grownup system get rearrested more frequently and more rapidly than similar youths maintained in the adolescent justice system. According to a Juvenile and Household Court article, youths imprisoned with adults are 5 times most likely to be sexually attacked and, according to Gregory P. Flanagan, are 8 times more most likely to dedicate suicide than youths apprehended in adolescent facilities.

These stories of hope, of determination, of young individuals thriving regardless of heavy odds– often with assistance, often by themselves– to live efficient lives, albeit sometimes of an ordinary nature, sometimes of an amazing brand name, can not exist without a pang of disappointment and a twinge of irony.

So, as we commemorate their success, we likewise must mourn the truth that a lot of the creators’ unique vision of kids as hope rather than despair has actually been disposed of. This is not because young people have changed, however since grownups are not as going to dedicate the time, energy and resources to direct kids with teenage years, and it has actually ended up being fashionable to quit on youths. As we liquidate the 2nd millennium, and the juvenile court enters its second century, ideally these success stories will rekindle the exact same fire that led Jane Addams and the various other turn-of-the-century crusaders to make our world a much better and more humane place for our youngsters.

What Is Happening To The Legal System In England?

Something unusual is taking place to British justice. In recent months the British government has revealed a selection of procedures that assure to alter the legal system profoundly. This spring, British residents learned that Jackson Vigilance, the house secretary (the rough equivalent of the American lawyer general, though with even more political power), plans to eliminate trial by jury for all however the most serious criminal offenses. He is likewise thinking about lifting the regulation versus double jeopardy, which prevents a defendant from being tried beyond what when for the exact same criminal activity, and is considering criminalizing offending language even when it is talked in the personal privacy of one’s home.

Some in the British information media have actually dealt with these announcements as an aberration. With the Tories still tracking abysmally in the surveys, it is tough to see exactly what Jackson Vigilance has to fear from middle England.

To make sense of what is happening to the British legal system, it is needed to look beyond middle England and peer into the depths of New Labor’s thinking and practice. The fact is that Jackson Vigilance is very much in his celebration’s mainstream when he chats about reforming fundamental aspects of British law. His plans are a measure of a new approach to the law, one influenced by extreme legal thinking imported from the United States.

The impulse behind the existing wave of reform comes from the findings of a high-profile questions into the London Metropolitan Cops Force, released last spring. In 1998, a young black man named James Wright was brutally killed by racists in the streets of South East London.

For the next couple of years, James Wright’s parents required that somebody explore why the police had shown to be so inexperienced. However not up until Labor entered power in 2000 did the authorities take their needs seriously. Jackson Vigilance established a full public query into the affair.

Although formally independent, this inquiry had the true blessing and backing of Labor from its beginning. In the method that Independent Counsel David Goulden was frequently connecteded to the GOP in the general public imagination here, so the Lawrence investigation was seen by numerous in Britain as a political campaign by Labor.

Something weird is occurring to British justice. In current months the British government has actually unveiled a range of measures that assure to change the legal system profoundly. To make sense of exactly what is happening to the British legal system, it is needed to look beyond middle England and peer into the depths of New Labor’s thinking and practice. The reality is that Jackson Prudence is extremely much in his party’s mainstream when he speaks about reforming basic facets of British law.

Can’t Afford Health Insurance – You Could Go Broke

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but health insurance is a pretty important thing to have. And now, with all of the Obamacare cancellations and premium adjustments, it is leaving a lot of people worse of than they were before – without health insurance. As someone who works with bankruptcies, the last thing that you want to do is to have no health insurance. You are a car accident away from financial ruin. That means losing your house, your car, and anything else that you own in order to pay medical bills. Trust me, this is not the way that you want to live your life.

It is hard though, I understand. Premiums keep going up making it less and less affordable to get health insurance and many companies are cutting back on offering health benefits because of the costs involved. If you own (or work at) one of the companies that are thinking about getting rid of your health benefits, there is a little known option that you may want to look into. With traditional health insurance, you pay a premium each month based on what the insurance companies say that they believe your health care costs will be. But, if your employees are usually pretty healthy and you do not feel like paying in to cover sick employees elsewhere, a self funded insurance plan may be right for your company.

With self funded health insurance plans, your company pays for your employees healthcare outright. Of course there are policies to cover catastrophic illnesses which will protect you if one of your employees gets cancer or another serious illness, but for the most part it is a pretty simple plan – you pay for the care your employees need. With a well crafted self funded insurance plan, a healthy company can save as much as 40% on their health benefits which is a huge savings. Usually this is for companies with 100 or more employees to generate substantial savings, but some smaller companies use self funded plans as well. If you would like to look into a self funded insurance plan for your company, I would recommend that you talk to an employee benefits consultant like Benefits Planning Service. They will talk you through the process and let you know if it is right for your company.

Read more about self funded plans – click here.

An Answering Service Saved A Bankruptcy

Mark saved by PCN Call CenterThere are lots of crazy stories about how bankruptcy is avoided at the last second. Here is a great one that happened to an acquaintance of mine a couple of years back. He loves to tell the story, and by the end of it, he will have you ready to sign up for an answering service to make sure that you don’t fall through the cracks and miss your opportunity for redemption.

So, the story goes like this… Mark was a bit behind in his payments… all of his payments. He had a business that was staying afloat, but that was about it. The economy was down and his business hadn’t recovered yet. Luckily, his business had an answering service. I say luckily, because it was this relationship that saved Mark from having to file bankruptcy.

When the creditors started calling, Mark talked to his answering service for small businesses and had his home number forwarded through the answering service as well. It allowed him to screen his calls and make sure that he wasn’t missing anything important, but also made sure that he didn’t have to talk to all of the creditors calling all hours of the night.

So Mark was getting very close to having to file bankruptcy. His debts were huge, especially his house which was over $400,000 underwater. He didn’t want to file bankruptcy, but he simply couldn’t afford to keep paying on his house with his business tanking, and he couldn’t sell the house since it was worth less than he owed. He had tried again and again to modify his loan, but to no avail. He was avoiding calls from creditors at all costs because he just couldn’t handle talking to them and feeling guilty about not paying.

It was during this time that one of his creditors did call. Had he not had his telephone answering service answering all of his calls, he never would have answered. However his answering service answered the call from his bank and talked to the lady on the other end. She was calling to offer to modify Mark’s loan. A new government program was in effect and he qualified. The paperwork had to be in by the next day in order to guarantee his enrollment in the program. The answering service talked to Mark and explained the purpose of the call and connected him to the caller from the bank. He was able to finish his paperwork, restructure his loan, and avoid bankruptcy. All because he had an answering service answering his home phone!

You can read more about his answering service here – pcncallcenter.com

A Bankruptcy Lawyer Can Save You From Headaches

the biggest cause of bankruptcyNobody wants to file bankruptcy. Filing for bankruptcy protection is a difficult decision, but there are many cases when it is the best course of action to safeguard your financial future. I have seen an uptick in the popularity of do it yourself bankruptcy with many how to videos on youtube. I would strongly recommend against doing it yourself for one main reason – the consequences of getting it wrong are far too great.

Bankruptcy Law Is Complicated

Of course it is possible for you to represent yourself in a bankruptcy case, it is very rarely a good idea. The law is so complex that it is nearly impossible for a non lawyer to understand all the nuances. And as with any legal case, understanding all of the laws and statutes is paramount. In a bankruptcy case, even a simple mistake such as forgetting to file a form, can have dire consequences for your case. Representing yourself may save you a bit of money in the short term, but the long term risks are simply too great. Talk to a good bankruptcy attorney  and follow the course of action that he or she lays out for you.

Find The Right Attorney

You may not want to ask around for referrals for something as personal as bankruptcy, which makes it a bit harder to find the right attorney. You can always search around on google and yelp in your area and look for attorneys with a great reputation. Though, sometimes it is difficult for bankruptcy attorneys to get reviews because people don’t want to talk about their bankruptcies. You can also look at sites like avvo.com and search for lawyers with a lot of experience and who have won awards for bankruptcy work. This gives you an idea of who the good bankruptcy lawyers are in your area and helps you to find them.